<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>gCaptain - Latest Comments in Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog about ships!</description><atom:link href="https://gcaptain.disqus.com/top_10_anti_piracy_weapons_for_future_use_innbspsomalia/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:19:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said Tom! My company (Shipguard) has a hundred former Royal Marines, an arsenal to die for (excuse the pun); and we can't get any business because they think we are going to start WW3! Hardly. I am becoming increasingly amazed and frustrated at how stupid people in high places can be. On one of our courses recently, we were audited by a top man from the UK Govt.  While discussing search techniques, I started telling delegates what the law says about the use of force. He starting shouting that we can't use force. So I asked him what he would do when conducting a personal gate search if he found someone was carrying - he said 'You mustn't touch them, just follow them around and report if they do anything'. No wonder we're in such a mess. PC gone horribly wrong. We have a bunch of academic pen-pushers and box-tickers in charge who are afraid of litigation and have no practical experience and understanding of security. Idiots.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Cowling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:19:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is nuts. You name your town, anywhere in the USA and the local police are armed. They have a hand gun, shot gun and an AR-15. Who are they armed against? US citizens who might give them trouble. Evey bank, 7-11, etc, has someone pick up and or deliver money, these guys are armed. A cargo vessel or tanker has 100's of millions of dollars worth of cargo. No armed protection? Only willing to use non lethal defenses? WTF? Who are these pirates that are armed with heavy machine guns and rockets willing to kidnap and kill ship crews that they deserve to have non lethal force when the average US citizen does not get this? Why are we going through all this expense robot boats super speakers and other contortions when a 50 cal and a few big guns is what is needed. I am sure there are plenty of cargo ships out there that are independently armed to the teeth. I have no doubt on this. It's not reported by the PC press. But its time we take this threat seriously a deal with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah I've heard that about LRAD company too. Much more promising is the Magnetic Audio Device or MAD, which I've used loads of time as a private security contractor onboard ships doing Gulf of Aden transits. its much easier to move and compared to the LRAD and Hyperspikes that Ive used is more powerful. We combined it with a makeshift electrified fence around the vessels freeboard on one transit and the pirates didnt even bother firing, they just turned and went and attacked another ship behind us, which they hijacked!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Smudge</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i dont understand this crap about non leathal weaponry they are pirates, the shipping comarny should buy an ar-15 for the crew, train them how to use it and arm the ship with a few 20mm cannons, much less expensive than paying ransom, much more effective than some speaker crap.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:04:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thomas Jefferson would call this a wimpy response.  Truth is, the solution is to pull into their ports and shell their towns.  Much as the US Navy did during the Barbery Pirate's actions.  Further, the merchantmen need to protect themselves ACTIVELY.  This means they need to be armed in some manner.  There is no reason a container carrier couldn't carry a couple of pods with some BOFORS cannons and blow the scumbags out of the water.  Further, individual scumbags found at sea should be SUMMARILY hung by the ship's captain that catches them.  No need for trial.  It's the high seas.  Much like the law of land warfare - there is  solution already for this type of behavior but folks are too squeamish to apply them.  There is no right to due process for non Americans. So screwem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Decatur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Weapons are a proven deterrent. Not one armed vessel has been hijacked. End of story. A very visible team of ex-RM types armed with HV and intelligently applied razor-wire will send pirates elsewhere.  Regards, JimC   &lt;a href="http://www.shipguard.eu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.shipguard.eu"&gt;www.shipguard.eu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Cowling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Simple solution.  Have cargo ships equipped with device that takes out steering when attacked.  Then, pirates have no way to bring booty home.  Ship will just meander out of control until navy vessels can arrive and confront.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Ascher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The UN should get together and clean up the whole coast line of Somalia along with the pirates. If they do not it will grow a lot worse. Let us not look for small solution. The only thing the pirates will respect is force.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adamek  Yak</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;just shoot them simple and stop all this nonsese&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LRAD as a weapon?  what a laugh it's a friggin speaker and not even a good one at that! &lt;br&gt;ATC has forever lied and BS'd the media on the capability of the LRAD and nothing Woody Norris ever sells goes anywhere, he's in the business of selling stock shares these day's and could care less if the company ever show's a dime to the investors 15 years and counting! &lt;br&gt;Media take note Elwood Norris and his band of stooges only lie when they are talking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Give me a belt fed BMG MA-Duece and I'll cure your somalia problem and it won't cost ya 35k for a worthless toy noisemaker.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pirate Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;read the anti pirate weapons,but it seems the pirates are too tough to handle! why take so much time to tame em? the somalis are........&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aden mohamed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748298</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand all this non-lethal crap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Real Q-ships, armed with Hellfire, Phalanx, twin .50 mounts, and a platoon of Marines. Problem solved.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ziptang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone thought about upending the pirates by sending bogey bait ships with armed teams to take them down?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aziz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-40748296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I would like to say, LRAD isn't the best option, we have trialled with SBS in Poole UK, (This is our companies Background) and a number of guys walked upto it. Not only this the pirates will just put thinks in there ears. Our company supplies training and equipment for maritime security, These include Running Gear Entanglement system, Covert detection equipment, which fires out smoke, CS &amp;amp; Flash crash, thermal imagery, to give advanced warning. etc etc, None lethal you do have to take in many considerations, But if worked with Lethal as a last resort , This gives a better legal footing. As you have taken all precautions necessary with none lethal equipment, to stop boarding. You then take a lethal approach As last resort. There are many ways to skin a cat and every incident will be differant from the last. &lt;br&gt;So Good training to all crew for Anti Piracy , Maybe enough to stop your vessel be taken and your crew being taken as hostage. We run a 5 day course for crews, on Maritime hostile enviroment. please feel free to contact andy@gatorglobal.co.uk&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-3223925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it is a bit opportunistic to think that above measures will stop pirates, espicially when nowadays they are heavily armed with rocket launchers, machine guns, grenades, which are produced somewhere as well.&lt;br&gt;Best solution is to finally recognize that poverty needs to be eradicated, only then will the seeds of piracy and terrorism be washed away.&lt;br&gt;Incentive for piracy is money, if people earn money in different ways, ti support themselve san dbuild up their lives, it take s away the incentive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hugo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:48:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-3026647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LRAD is the best solution set. They are the product evaluated and selected by the US Navy to meet stringent operational requirements. Additionally, their systems performance has been verified by joint testing - perhaps this is why the US Army recently posted a sole source statement WRT LRAD products. Bottom line, LRAD X-series is the best AHD out there, and of the 10 listed options, the best non-lethal capability to determine intent and deter hostile targets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JGalt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:24:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-3026589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regardless of the Wattre employee's garbage spewed above, LRAD is the industry leading capability as tested and verified by the services. HS-24 makes a lot of claims, but they have not made headway in the market for a reason - LRAD products are better. US Navy has selected LRAD as their AHD provider, and recently the US Army has issued a sole source statement which precludes procurement. Pretty darn clear what joint evaluation has discovered as to which AHD is best in the market....LRAD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Galt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-3008781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LRAD is the best solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hector</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2941730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As  an engineer I read your suggestions with delight. In my book a total waste of good money. A .308 Magnum Elephant Rifle with laser sights will take out a Yamaha Outboard Engine they use at 500 yards  night or day. Without any alternative &lt;br&gt;propulsion the pirate boats will have to call on their mobile phones  for help. Take out the Phone receiver/transmitters with a missile and pirates cannot communicate . After 47 days with a Kalitchnikov at my back I believe that I may be talking from experience , not unworkable or unsustainable dreaming and spin bullshit. Imagine the spare parts for those gizmos alone. Keep it simple and ask the lads and lassies sorry mamseilles, who have been there done that and survived. Vive Le France. Freddo&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Parle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2932568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck with that!  ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gcaptain</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2931703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am afraid that the only weapons we have on ship out of those listed is the fire hose and fire monitor!.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm going to put a requisition in with corporate and see if we can get a couple of those lightening trucks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Dinsmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2751125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No. 1 is definitely true - as long as the problem does not affect you/ your ship/ your family... &lt;br&gt;From the vessel's point of view nothing else can be done as to be vigilant and alert warships in the vicinity - there is the problem: there are not enough warships in the vicinity, and they do not have a clear order for engagement!&lt;br&gt;Danish fregate brings SOmali Pirates back to Somali beach because they do not know what to do with them.... mmmm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More navy to create and protect a safe corridor through the Gulf of Aden!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">henningp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2748922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Acoustic Hailing devices are step one in the process  to determine intent. Once intent  is established escalation to a non lethal and subsequent lethal response is warranted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The LRAD is not the only game in town the Hyperspike 24 kicks butt on the LRAD in range,  size, weight and cost - all critical items when deploying on a ship or platform - have a look at &lt;a href="http://wattre.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wattre.com"&gt;wattre.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also the LRAD company looks shaky from the  financial perspective they have lost 87% of stock value in the last year - ticker ATCO.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alpha Juliette</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:22:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2748731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On many occasions, the ship comes to know only after the pirates have already boarded the vessel. You need more man power and alert lookouts. Also pirates are heavily armed and they approach in speed boats. Only warships can deter them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OldSailor</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:43:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Piracy Weapons &amp;#8211; Top 10 For Future Use In Somalia</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/#comment-2746632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes and they can finally use that boat Blackwater bought from King's Point:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/anti-pirate-weapons-piracy-somalia/"&gt;http://gcaptain.com/maritim...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Capt. Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>