<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>gCaptain - Latest Comments in Ships Of The Future &amp;#8211; LCS, Littoral Combat Ship</title><link>http://gcaptain.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog about ships!</description><atom:link href="https://gcaptain.disqus.com/ships_of_the_future_lcs_littoral_combatnbspship/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:15:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ships Of The Future &amp;#8211; LCS, Littoral Combat Ship</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/ships-of-the-future-lcs-littoral-combat-ship/#comment-2526749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John you havent see ours yet.  That is LCS-2 It carries more twice the payload and dwarfs the competition in size. LCS-1 is not capable of 45 kts with a mission package onboard. Infact I hear it barley made 40kts during a full power run. Not bad for being two years behind schedule and over budget by a few hundred million.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry P.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>