<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>gCaptain - Latest Comments in Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog about ships!</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:59:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347801</link><description>The present ISPR report as I understand is part1  of 2 reports. I found the brief timeline in the introduction-summary to be inconsistant with the animation and navigational data. With the  0827- 0831 animation I found further conflicts with the probable scenario.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john Denham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347803</link><description>The present ISPR report as I understand is part1  of 2 reports. I found the brief timeline in the introduction-summary to be inconsistant with the animation and navigational data. With the  0827- 0831 animation I found further conflicts with the probable scenario.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john Denham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:59:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347798</link><description>There is a reasonably good timed animation showing the the period 08:28:52 PST - 08:31:37 PST here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/gcaptain-s3/maritime/video/dec07/CB_Thru_Span_2_dbl-Desktop.m4v" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://s3.amazonaws.com/gcaptain-s3/maritime/vi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as explained here:&lt;br&gt;Cosco Busan - ECDIS Tracking w/ Google Maps&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cosco-busan-google-earth-tracking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cosco-busan-g...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:05:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347795</link><description>The period 08:27:27 PST - 08:31:37 PST is reasonably well documented in an animation here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/gcaptain-s3/maritime/video/dec07/CB_Thru_Span_2_dbl-Desktop.m4v" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://s3.amazonaws.com/gcaptain-s3/maritime/vi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as explained here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cosco-busan-google-earth-tracking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cosco-busan-g...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is my understanding that the ISPR was meant to deal with the response to the allision, leaving the cause of the allision to other investigations; in particular but not limited to the NTSB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 03:34:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347800</link><description>My perusal of the summary disclosed several inconsistancies in the BREIF TIMELINE OF EVENTS. From events 0820 through 0829 does not appear navigationally feasible. If this is a pre-cursor of the ISPR expertness, we will never know why the COSCO BUSAN allided with the fender on D tower. My chart analysis  using reported speed  and stated facts produce different situations  than can have actually happened. I feel the statements maybe true but are not sequentlualy correct.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john Denham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent Panel Releases Report on Cosco&amp;nbsp;Busan</title><link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/independent-panel-releases-report-on-cosco-busan/#comment-1347805</link><description>I have heard rumors to the effect that Capt. Cota (the pilot) was dropped by MOPS, his license insurance provider.  Can anyone verify this?  And if so, is there a known reason?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>